Citation Information :
Somkuwar JK, Ansari AA, Singh RK, Bahal R. Comparative Evaluation of BRIX3000 Smart Burs and Conventional Technique of Caries Excavation among 5–9-year-old Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2024; 7 (3):143-150.
Background: Conventional caries removal procedures often remove healthy tooth structure, and children find them challenging due to the vibrations and noise involved. Therefore, BRIX3000 and Smart Burs (SB) were introduced to preserve healthy tooth structure and reduce discomfort during caries removal.
Aim: To evaluate the time consumption, efficacy, and patient satisfaction among 5–9-year-old children during caries removal with BRIX3000, SB, and conventional diamond burs (CDB).
Materials and methods: About 54 children diagnosed with class I cavitated carious lesions were included in the study and randomized into three groups: BRIX3000, SB, and CDB. The study evaluated efficiency (working time), efficacy (presence of residual caries confirmed with caries detector dye), and patient satisfaction using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 statistical software.
Results: For optimal performance, CDB demonstrated the highest efficiency and efficacy, followed by BRIX3000, with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Conversely, SB showed the lowest efficiency and efficacy, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Regarding patient satisfaction, BRIX3000 was perceived as the most satisfactory, followed by SB, whereas CDB was rated the least satisfactory (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: All three treatment modalities removed infected caries effectively; however, BRIX3000 proved to be potentially effective in minimally invasive caries excavation and was more comfortable for children compared to SB and CDB.
Cortes M, Pecorari VG, Basting RT, et al. Effect of rotatory instrument speed on its capacity to remove demineralized and sound dentin. Eur J Dent 2013;7(4):429–435. DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.120676
Mhatre S, Sinha S, Bijle MN, et al. Chemo-mechanical caries removal system—a brief review. Int J Clin Dent Sci 2011;2(2):52–57.
Silva NRFA, Carvalho RM, Pegoraro LF, et al. Evaluation of a self-limiting concept in dentinal caries removal. J Dent Res 2006;85(3):282–286. DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500315
Inamdar MS, Chole DG, Bakle SS, et al. Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, CARIE CARE, and SMART BURS in caries excavation: an in vivo study. J Conserv Dent 2020;23(2):163–168. DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_269_20
Aswathi KK, Rani SP, Athimuthu A, et al. Comparison of efficacy of caries removal using polymer bur and chemomechanical caries removal agent: a clinical and microbiological assessment—an in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2017;35(1):6–13. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.199232
Pires Corrêa FN, de Oliveira Rocha R, Filho LER, et al. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2007;31(3):187–192. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.3.l440852707v3g1u0
Hegde MN, MA Abhishek. Chemomechanical caries removal: a conservative and pain-free approach. Adv Res Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;5(3):69–71. DOI: 10.19080/ARGH.2017.05.555666
Ismail MM, Haidar AH. Impact of BRIX 3000 and conventional restorative treatment on pain reaction during caries removal among group of children in Baghdad city. J Bagh Coll Dent 2019;31(2):7–13. DOI: 10.26477/jbcd.v31i2.2617
Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child 1962;29:150–163.
Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: a microbiological assessment. Br Dent J 1993;174(7):245–248. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808142
Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, et al. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. A multi-centre study. Caries Res 1999;33(3):171–177. DOI: 10.1159/000016513
Merkel S, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S. Pain assessment in infants and young children: the FLACC scale. Am J Nurs 2002;102(10):55–58. DOI: 10.1097/00000446-200210000-00024
Zakirulla M, Uloopi KS, Reddy VV. In vivo comparison of reduction in bacterial count after caries excavation with 3 different techniques. J Dent Child 2011;78(1):31–35. PMID: 22041006.
Kohli A, Sahani S. Chemicomechanical caries removal; a promising revolution: say no to dental drills. Int J Dent Med Res 2015;1(5):158–161.
Kavvadia K, Karagianni V, Polychronopoulou A, et al. Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(1):23–28.
Gupta S, Singh C, Yeluri R, et al. Clinical and microbiological evaluation of the carious dentin before and after application of Papacarie gel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;38(2):133–138. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.2j237v545437527m
Goyal A, Srivastava M, Khanduja R, et al. Comparative evaluation of efficiency, efficacy, and patient perception of caries excavation burs in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2022;5(1):12. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3214
Prabhakar A, Kiran NK. Clinical evaluation of polyamide polymer burs for selective carious dentin removal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10(4):26–34.
Gomez J, Tellez M, Pretty IA, et al. Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: a systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2013;41(1):54–66. DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12021
Macey R, Walsh T, Riley P, et al. Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;2018(12):CD013215. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013215
Beltramini A, Milojevic K, Pateron D. Pain assessment in newborns, infants, and children. Pediatr Ann 2017;46(10):e387–e395. DOI: 10.3928/19382359-20170921-03
Bohari MR, Chunawalla YK, Ahmed BMN. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(1):40–47. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1093
Allen KL, Salgado TL, Janal MN, et al. Removing carious dentin using a polymer instrument without anesthesia versus a carbide bur with anesthesia. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(5):643–651. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0237
Balachandran J, Raees T, Rao M, et al. Evaluation of efficacy of chemo-mechanical method of caries removal using BRIX-3000 compared to conventional excavation with burs—a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Dent Assoc 2020;14(6). DOI: 10.33882/jida.14.25900
Alkhouli MM, Al Nesser SF, Bshara NG, et al. Comparing the efficacies of two chemo-mechanical caries removal agents (2.25% sodium hypochlorite gel and BRIX 3000), in caries removal and patient cooperation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent 2020;93:103280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103280
Ismail MMM, Al Haidar AHMJ. Evaluation of the efficacy of caries removal using papain gel (BRIX 3000) and smart preparation bur (in vivo comparative study). J Pharm Sci Res 2019;11(2):444–449.
Freedman G, Goldstep F. Polymer preparation instruments. New paradigm in selective dentin removal. Dent Today 2003;22(4):58–61.
Dammaschke T, Rodenberg TN, Schäfer E, et al. Efficiency of the polymer bur SmartPrep compared with conventional tungsten carbide bud bur in dentin caries excavation. Oper Dent 2006;31(2):256–260. DOI: 10.2341/05-24
Somani R, Chaudhary R, Jaidka S, et al. Comparative microbiological evaluation after caries removal by various burs. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(6):524–527. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1678
Kochhar GK, Srivastava N, Pandit IK, et al. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011;36(1):5–9. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.36.1.u2421l4j68847215
Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, et al. Various methods of caries removal in children: a comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25(2):93–96. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.33456
Soni HK, Sharma A, Sood PB. A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2015;16:19–26. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-014-0140-1
Gupta N, Chowdhary N, Reddy VR, et al. Evaluation of caries removal efficacy using BRIX 3000 and atraumatic restorative treatment in primary molars: a clinical comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2022;23(4):419–424.