Journal of South Asian Association of Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  7 (2024)
Volume  6 (2023)
Volume  5 (2022)
Volume  4 (2021)
Volume  3 (2020)
Volume  2 (2019)
Volume  1 (2018)
Related articles

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2024 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

A Minimally Invasive Digitally Customized Esthetic Restoration of Primary Anterior Tooth—CroVen (Crown ± Veneer): A Clinical Case Report

Gaurav Gupta, Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Manikya Kumar Nanduri, Richa Gupta, Parth Shah

Keywords : Case report, Dental restoration, Dental veneer, Digital, Temporary, Workflow

Citation Information : Gupta G, Gupta DK, Nanduri MK, Gupta R, Shah P. A Minimally Invasive Digitally Customized Esthetic Restoration of Primary Anterior Tooth—CroVen (Crown ± Veneer): A Clinical Case Report. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2024; 7 (2):104-108.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3302

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 06-09-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Adhesive dentistry depends on cautious tooth preparation for long-term cosmetic maintenance. New instruments and methods have been developing continuously to address this. When it comes to anterior teeth, esthetics is crucial. Direct and indirect laminate veneers are preferred over full-ceramic crowns due to their conservative and esthetically pleasing nature. Aim: As an alternative to crowns and veneers, this article intends to preserve primary tooth structure through digital workflow for individualized restorative preparation. Materials and methods: In order to produce a customized restoration using Chairside Economical Restoration of Esthetic Ceramics (CEREC), the palatal margins are tailored in this restoration without affecting the occlusion. Under local anesthesia, just the labial and modest proximal reductions were performed. Results: A beautiful and effective restoration was provided. Conclusion: Here, the customized restoration is not only esthetic but is minimally invasive as compared to prefabricated crowns covering all tooth surfaces. This acknowledged for sustainable functional customized restoration which restored the natural appearance of the tooth.

PDF Share
  1. Mendes FM, De Benedetto MS, del Conte Zardetto CG, et al. Resin composite restoration in primary anterior teeth using short-post technique and strip crowns: a case report. Quintessence Int 2004;35(9):689–692.
  2. Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, et al. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015(12):CD005512. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3
  3. Magne P, Belser UC. Novel porcelain laminate preparation approach driven by a diagnostic mock-up. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16(1):7–16; discussion 17–18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00444.x
  4. Silva BPD, Stanley K, Gardee J. Laminate veneers: preplanning and treatment using digital guided tooth preparation. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32(2):150–160. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12571
  5. Lee H, Fehmer V, Kwon KR, et al. Virtual diagnostics and guided tooth preparation for the minimally invasive rehabilitation of a patient with extensive tooth wear: a validation of a digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123(1):20–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.023
  6. Clark L, Wells MH, Harris EF, et al. Comparison of amount of primary tooth reduction required for anterior and posterior zirconia and stainless steel crowns. Pediatric Dent 2016;38(1):42–46.
  7. Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, et al. General dental practitioners’ views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars. Br Dent J 2005;199(7):453–455; discussion 441. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812746
  8. Muhamad AH, Watted N, Abdulgani A, et al. Anterior dental esthetics in primary teeth. Int J Public Health Res 2015;3(1):25–36.
  9. Taha Y, Raslan F, Ali A, et al. Guided tooth preparation device fabricated with a complete digital workflow: a dental technique. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125(2):221–224.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.009
  10. Aziz A, El-Mowafy O, Paredes S. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology: a systematic review. Dent Med Probl 2020;57(2):197–206. DOI: 10.17219/dmp/115522
  11. Valenti M, Valenti A. Retrospective survival analysis of 261 lithium disilicate crowns in a private general practice. Quintessence Int 2009;40(7):573–579.
  12. Solá-Ruiz MF, Lagos-Flores E, Roman-Rodriguez JL, et al. Survival rates of a lithium disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit esthetic fixed partial dentures: a 10-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26(2):175–180. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3045
  13. Etman MK, Woolford MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103(2):80–90. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60010-8
  14. Kern M, Sasse M, Wolfart S. Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143(3):234–240. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0147
  15. Alkadi L, Ruse ND. Fracture toughness of two lithium disilicate dental glass ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116(4):591–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.009
  16. Wiedhahn K. From blue to white: new high-strength material for Cerec–IPS e.max CAD LT. Quintessence 2007;10(1):79–91.
  17. Ram D, Fuks AB. Clinical performance of resin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors: a retrospective study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16(1):49–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00680.x
  18. Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent 2002;24(5):511–516.
  19. Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent 2015;37(2):163–170.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.