Citation Information :
Pamidi VC, Mavuri PP, Javangula TP, Pampana SG, Medisetti SN, Manupati V. Use of Tongue Flap in Anterior Palatal Fistula Repair: A Case Report. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2024; 7 (1):42-45.
Aims and background: Orofacial clefts are one of the most prevalent congenital anomalies worldwide and contribute significantly to the global burden. Cleft of the palate is widespread and negatively impacts health and child development, leading to social isolation, speech problems, malnutrition, and psychological effects.
Case description: A 9-year-old child reported to the department with the chief complaint of regurgitation of liquids through the nose. The patient was diagnosed with an anterior palatal fistula. The present case report provides insight into the use of tongue flaps for palatal fistula closure and a brief review of other techniques.
Conclusion: Though recurrent palatal fistula closure is a difficult condition, there are several treatments available, and the success of the treatment depends on the size and position of the fistula and clinical expertise.
Clinical significance: Utilization of tongue flaps to close palatal abnormalities is associated with a low incidence of complications and a higher rate of success in both children and adults. When treating end-stage palatal anomalies, tongue flap closure is associated with a high success rate and a low rate of complications in both children and adults.
Mahajan RK, Chhajlani R, Ghildiyal HC. Role of tongue flap in palatal fistula repair: a series of 41 cases. Indian J Plast Surg 2014;47(2):210–215. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.138950
Muzaffar AR, Byrd HS, Rohrich RJ, et al. Incidence of cleft palate fistula: an institutional experience with two-stage palatal repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108(6):1515–1518. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00011
Eberlinc A, Koželj V. Incidence of residual oronasal fistulas: a 20-year experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2012;49(6):643–648. DOI: 10.1597/10-146
Mittal G, Agarwal A, Kataria G. Flaps for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction: review of literature and a clinical guide to the clinicians. Asian J Oncol 2018;4(2):037–42. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676873
Gupta N, Shetty S, Degala S. Tongue flap: a “workhorse flap” in repair of recurrent palatal fistulae. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;24(1):93–101. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-019-00823-9
Bracka A. The blood supply of dorsal tongue flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1981;34(4):379–384. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(81)90040-0
Vasishta SM, Krishnan G, Rai YS, et al. The versatility of the tongue flap in the closure of palatal fistula. Craniomax Trauma Reconst 2012;5(3):145–160. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313352
Zemann W, Kruse AL, Lüebbers HT, et al. Microvascular tissue transfer in cleft palate patients: advocacy of the prelaminated radial free forearm flap. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22(6):2006–2010. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31823197d8
Kobayashi S, Fukawa T, Hirakawa T, et al. The folded buccal musculomucosal flap for large palatal fistulae in cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2014;2(2):e112. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000058
Choi JM, Park H, Oh TS. Use of a buccinator myomucosal flap and bilateral pedicled buccal fat pad transfer in wide palatal fistula repair: a case report. Arch Craniofac Surg 2021;22(4):209–213. DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2021.00269
Ashtiani AK, Emami SA, Rasti M. Closure of complicated palatal fistula with facial artery musculomucosal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116(2):381–386. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000142475.63276.87
De Jong JP, Breugem CC. Early hard palate closure using a vomer flap in unilateral cleft lip and palate: effects on cleft width. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18(4):1285–1290. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1091-3
Tunçbilek G, Konaş E, Kayikçioğlu A, et al. Three-layer oronasal fistula repair with sandwiched mastoid fascia graft. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23(3):780–783. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dbd68
Schwabegger AH, Hubli E, Rieger M, et al. Role of free-tissue transfer in the treatment of recalcitrant palatal fistulae among patients with cleft palates. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113(4):1131–1139. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000110370.67325.ed
