Journal of South Asian Association of Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Different Pediatric Toothpastes on Candida albicans in Children with and without Early Childhood Caries

Purna Sai Prasad Kolavali, BV Thimma Reddy, Uday Chowdary Birapu, Raichurkar Hemanth Kumar, Kanamarlapudi Venkata Saikiran, Gunde Veronica

Keywords : Candida albicans, Dentifrice, Early childhood caries

Citation Information : Kolavali PS, Reddy BT, Birapu UC, Kumar RH, Saikiran KV, Veronica G. Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Efficacy of Different Pediatric Toothpastes on Candida albicans in Children with and without Early Childhood Caries. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2022; 5 (3):127-131.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3239

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 26-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the antifungal efficacy of four commercially available pediatric toothpaste on Candida albicans in children with and without early childhood caries (ECC). Materials and methods: A total of 40 children were randomly divided into two groups; group I: ECC and group II: non-ECC, with 20 children in each group. After that, sterile cotton swabs were used to collect plaque samples from the tooth surface, and the samples were inoculated on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and incubated for 72 hours. After the growth was confirmed, four commercially available dentifrices were divided into four subgroups Kidodent®, Cheerio gel®, Pediflor®, and Colgate kids toothpaste® were titrated to a 1:1 dilution to identify the antifungal activity of C. albicans. Four wells, each of 4 mm in depth and 6 mm in diameter, were punched on the agar surface and filled with 0.02 mL of dentifrice solution using a microtiter pipette. Agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours, and the mean diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured and recorded. The collected data were tabulated and statistically analyzed using the chi-square and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Results: Kidodent® in the ECC group had a maximum zone of inhibition (35.15 ± 5.75) with a significant difference when compared with Pediflor® and Colgate kids® (p < 0.001). In the non-ECC group, Cheerio gel® (14.95 ± 1.80) showed the maximum zone of inhibition, and no significant difference was seen with the other toothpastes (p > 0.001). Conclusion: Kidodent® toothpaste showed maximum antifungal efficacy for the ECC group and Cheerio gel® toothpaste showed maximum antifungal efficacy for the non-ECC group.


PDF Share
  1. Adwan G, Salameh Y, Adwan K, et al. Assessment of antifungal activity of herbal and conventional toothpastes against clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2012;2(5):375–379. DOI: 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60059-8
  2. Beena MS, Peedikayil FC, GufranAfmed MB, et al. Comparison of Candida species isolated from children with and without early childhood caries: a descriptive cross-sectional study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2017;35(4):296–300. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_160_17
  3. Vandana K, Raju SH, Badepalli RR, et al. Prevalence and risk-factors of early childhood caries among 2-6-year-old Anganwadi children in Nellore district, Andhra Pradesh, India: a cross-sectional survey. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29(4):428–433. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_75_17
  4. Chandhru TP, Anusha VR, Peedikayil FC, et al. Evaluation of antifungal activity of six children's toothpaste on Candida albicans isolated from early childhood caries patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2020;38(2):152–157. DOI: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_3_20
  5. Sahiti PS, Kamatham R, Saikiran KV. Impact of tooth brushing rhyme on the oral hygiene status of 6-7 year old children - an educational intervention study. Med Pharm Rep 2019;92(4):413–417. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1308
  6. Chen X, Daliri EB, Kim N, et al. Microbial etiology and prevention of dental caries: exploiting natural products to inhibit cariogenic biofilms. Pathogens 2020;9(7):569. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9070569
  7. Gupta P, Gupta N, Pawar AP, et al. Role of sugar and sugar substitutes in dental caries: a review. ISRN Dent 2013;2013:519421. DOI: 10.1155/2013/519421
  8. Sathyaprasad S, Mercy vinolia T, Krishnamoorthy SH. Prevention of early childhood caries- a review. Int J Curr Res 2020;12(12):15108–15117. DOI: 10.24941/ijcr.40330.12.2020
  9. Ismail AI, Sohn W. A systematic review of clinical diagnostic criteria of early childhood caries. J Public Health Dent 1999;59(3):171–191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1999.tb03267.x
  10. Ganesh A, Muthu MS, Mohan A, et al. Prevalence of early childhood caries in India - a systematic review. Indian J Pediatr 2019;86(3):276–286. DOI: 10.1007/s12098-018-2793-y
  11. Wyne A, Darwish S, Adenubi J, et al. The prevalence and pattern of nursing caries in Saudi preschool children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001;11(5):361–364. DOI: 10.1046/j.0960-7439.2001.00291.x
  12. Usha C, Ramarao S. Dental caries - a complete changeover (part I). J Conserv Dent 2009;12(2):46–54. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.55617
  13. Li YH, Tian X. Quorum sensing and bacterial social interactions in biofilms. Sensors (Basel) 2012;12(3):2519–2538. DOI: 10.3390/s120302519
  14. Peleg AY, Hogan DA, Mylonakis E. Medically important bacterial-fungal interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010;8(5):340–349. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2313
  15. Xiao J, Huang X, Alkhers N, et al. Candida albicans and early childhood caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Caries Res 2018;52(1-2):102–112. DOI: 10.1159/000481833
  16. Lozano Moraga CP, Rodriguez Martinez GA, Lefimil Puente CA, et al. Prevalence of Candida albicans and carriage of Candida non-albicans in the saliva of preschool children, according to their caries status. Acta Odontol Scand 2017;75(1):30–35. DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2016.1244560
  17. Wu N, Lin J, Wu L, et al. Distribution of Candida albicans in the oral cavity of children aged 3–5 years of Uygur and Han nationality and their genotype in caries-active groups. Genet Mol Res 2015;14(1):748–757. DOI: 10.4238/2015
  18. Sanz M, Serrano J, Iniesta M, et al. Antiplaque and antigingivitis toothpastes. Monogr Oral Sci 2013;23:27–44. DOI: 10.1159/000350465
  19. Prasanth M. Antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses: an in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2011;8(2):85–94. PMID: 22013468.
  20. Giuliana G, Pizzo G, Milici ME, et al. In vitro antifungal properties of mouthrinses containing antimicrobial agents. J Periodontol 1997;68(8):729–733. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.8.729
  21. Malhotra R, Singla S, Shashikiran ND. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of child formula dentifrices at different concentrations: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;10(2):131–135. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1422
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.