Journal of South Asian Association of Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2022 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Evaluation of Visual and Taste Distraction Techniques using RMS Pictorial Scale in making of Periapical Radiographs

Parimala Tyagi, Shikha Mali, Saumya V Rathi, Nikita Agrawal, Jinu M Abraham

Keywords : Dental anxiety, Intraoral periapical radiography, Taste distraction, Visual distraction

Citation Information : Tyagi P, Mali S, Rathi SV, Agrawal N, Abraham JM. Comparative Evaluation of Visual and Taste Distraction Techniques using RMS Pictorial Scale in making of Periapical Radiographs. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2022; 5 (1):32-37.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3219

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 29-03-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Anxiety is often experienced by children. Various methods of reducing anxiety have been used in dentistry. Amongst this distraction is commonly used. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare visual and taste distraction techniques during intraoral periapical radiography in children. Materials and methods: This study was an experimental study. The sample size was 60 and they were randomly allocated into group A- No Distraction (n = 20), group B- Taste Distraction with the help of the Lollipop method (n = 20), and group C- Visual Distraction Method with the help of Projector method (n = 20). The child's anxiety was checked with the help of the RMS Pictorial Scale. The anxiety was assessed before and after taking radiographs in respective groups. Result: Student t-test and one-way ANOVA was used to find the significance of study parameters. The highest anxiety reduction (mean difference) was seen in the visual distraction technique followed by taste distraction and no distraction technique. Conclusion: Environmental distractions such as visual and taste distraction techniques provide a positive environment and thereby help to reduce the anxiety in the child.


PDF Share
  1. W Monika, AstutiER, Mulyan WM. The quality of the lollipops use in the making of the anterior upper teeth periapical radiography of in paediatric patients. Eurasia J Biosc 2020;14:4049–4053.
  2. Quan X, Joseph A, Nanda U, et al. Improving pediatric radiography patient stress, mood, and parental satisfaction through positive environmental distractions: a randomized control trial. J Pediatr Nurs 2016;31(1):e11–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2015.08.004
  3. Salami A, Halabi MA, Hussein I, et al. An audit on the quality of intra-oral digital radiographs taken in a postgraduate pediatric dentistry setting. OHDM 2017;16(1):l3.
  4. Allani S, Dr. Setty VJ. Effectiveness of distraction techniques in the management of anxious children in the dental operatory. IOSR-JDMS 2016;15(10): 69–73. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1510026973
  5. McCaul KD, Malott JM. Distraction and coping with pain. Psychol Bull 1984; 95(3): 516–533. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.516
  6. Martin V. Using distraction techniques with children. Nursing 2013;43(11):68. DOI: 10.1097/01.nurse.0000435210.11271.c1
  7. Shetty RM, Khandelwal M, Rath S. RMS pictorial scale (RMS-PS): an innovative scale for the assessment of child's dental anxiety. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015;33(1):48–52. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.149006
  8. Chiri R, Awan S, Archibald S, Abbott PV. Parental knowledge and attitudes towards dental radiography for children. Aust Dent J 2013;58(2):163–169. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12041
  9. Gupta A, Devi P, Srivastava R, et al. Intra oral periapical radiography - basics yet intrigue: a review. Bangladesh Journal of Dental Research & Education 2017;4(2):83. DOI: 10.3329/bjdre.v4i2.20255
  10. PradoI M, Carcavalli L, Abreu LG, et al. Use of distraction techniques for the management of anxiety and fear in pediatric dental practice: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Int J Paediatr Dent 2019;29:650–668. DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12499
  11. Chhabra N, Chhabra A, Walia G. Prevalence of dental anxiety and fear among five to ten year old children: a behaviour based cross sectional study. Minerva Stomatol 2012;61:83–9.
  12. Cox IC, Krikken JB, Veerkamp JS. Influence of parental presence on the child's perception of, and behaviour, during dental treatment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2011;12:200–204. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262807
  13. Sanjay Mallya, Ernest Lam. White and Pharoah Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 8th edition. 2018.
  14. Mishra R, Singh AK, Singh P. A comparison of audio and audio-visual distraction techniques in managing dental anxiety in pediatric patients: a clinical study. Int J Med Res Prof. 2019; 5(3): 88–91. DOI:10.21276/ijmrp.2019.5.3.019
  15. Ghadimi S, Estaki Z, Rahbar P, et al. Effect of visual distraction on children's anxiety during dental treatment: a crossover randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2018;19(4):239–244. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-018-0352-x
  16. Venham LL, Goldstein M, Gaulin-Kremer E, et al. Effectiveness of a distraction technique in managing young dental patients. Pediatr Dent 1981;3(1):7–11.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.