Journal of South Asian Association of Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2022 ) > List of Articles


Comparative Evaluation of Triple Organic Paste vs Triple Antibiotic Paste: An In Vitro Study

Sudheer Kumar Kotha, BV Thimma Reddy, Uday Chowdary Birapu, Hemanth Kumar L Raichurkar, Kumar J Raghavendra

Keywords : Apexification, Crown discoloration, Regenerative endodontic treatment, Triple antibiotic paste, Triple organic paste

Citation Information : Kotha SK, Reddy BT, Birapu UC, Raichurkar HK, Raghavendra KJ. Comparative Evaluation of Triple Organic Paste vs Triple Antibiotic Paste: An In Vitro Study. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2022; 5 (3):136-146.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3244

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 27-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Context: The concept of the revascularization technique mainly depends on root canal sterilization, the presence of a template (blood clot), and coronary filling, which prevents marginal leakage. Successful disinfection is carried out by using triple antibiotic paste (TAP) as an intracanal medication due to its excellent antimicrobial activity, but its use is associated with discoloration of the tooth crown, the development of bacterial resistance, and allergic reactions. Aims: To evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of triple organic paste vs TAP against strains of Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, and Candida albicans. Methods and material: Natural products were divided into six groups and further divided into 18 subgroups. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined for each group using the trial and error method, and results were obtained after incubation for 24 hours at 37°C. Antibacterial efficacy was determined by zone of inhibition and compared with TAP (control group) individually against E. faecalis, S. mutans, and C. albicans. The values were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test. Results: All the subgroups have shown significant zone of inhibition values against E. faecalis, S. mutans, and C. albicans, except for the subgroup IC, where no statistically significant values were found when compared with the control group. Conclusion: Most of the combinations of natural products have shown better antibacterial efficacy when compared with TAP, suggesting its use to overcome the disadvantages of TAP. Further clinical studies are required for evaluating the antibacterial efficacy in vivo.

  1. Dahake PT, Baliga SM. Antimicrobial efficacy of a new tri-antibiotic combination against resistant endodontic pathogens: an in-vitro study. Braz Dent Sci 2020;23(4):8. DOI: 10.14295/bds.2020.v23i4.2186
  2. Mohammadi Z, Jafarzadeh H, Shalavi S, et al. A review on triple antibiotic paste as a suitable material used in regenerative endodontics. Iran Endod J 2018;13(1):1–6. DOI: 10.22037/iej.v13i1.17941
  3. Takushige T, Cruz EV, Asgor Moral A, et al. Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using a combination of antibacterial drugs. Int Endod J 2004;37(2):132–138. DOI: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00771.x
  4. Becerra P, Ricucci D, Loghin S, et al. Histologic study of a human immature permanent premolar with chronic apical abscess after revascularization/revitalization. J Endod 2014;40(1):133–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.017
  5. Saoud TM, Huang GT, Gibbs JL, et al. Management of teeth with persistent apical periodontitis after root canal treatment using regenerative endodontic therapy. J Endod 2015;41(10):1743–1748. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.004
  6. Lei L, Chen Y, Zhou R, et al. Histologic and immunohistochemical findings of a human immature permanent tooth with apical periodontitis after regenerative endodontic treatment. J Endod 2015;41(7):1172–1179. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.012
  7. Karp JM, Leng Teo GS. Mesenchymal stem cell homing: the devil is in the detail. Cell Stem Cell 2009;4(3):206–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.02.001
  8. Goering R, Dockrell H, Zuckerman M et al. Mims’ Medical Microbiology. 5th edn. St. Louis: Saunders, 2013.
  9. Rybak MJ, McGrath BJ. Combination antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections. Guidelines for the clinician. Drugs 1996;52(3):390–405. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199652030-00005
  10. Perron GG, Kryazhimsky S, Rice DP, et al. Multidrug therapy and evolution of antibiotic resistance: when order matters. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78(17):6137–6142. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01078-12
  11. Barnes GW, Langeland K. Antibody formation in primates following introduction of antigens into the root canal. J Dent Res 1966;45(4):1111–1114. DOI: 10.1177/00220345660450041501
  12. Reynolds K, Johnson JD, Cohenca N. Pulp revascularization of necrotic bilateral bicuspids using a modified novel technique to eliminate potential coronal discolouration: a case report. Int Endod J 2009;42(1):84–92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01467.x
  13. Windley W 3rd, Teixeira F, Levin L, et al. Disinfection of immature teeth with a triple antibiotic paste. J Endod 2005;31(6):439–443. DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000148143.80283.ea
  14. Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001;358(9276):135–138. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1
  15. Roilides E, Simitsopoulou M, Katragkou A, et al. How biofilms evade host defenses. Microbiol Spectr 2015;3(3). DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0012-2014
  16. Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H, et al. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions. Endod Topics 2005;10(1):77–102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00135.x
  17. S ASV, Ravi V, Prasad AS, et al. Herbendodontics–phytotherapy in endodontics: a review. Biomed pharmacol J 2018;11(2):1073–1082. DOI: 10.13005/bpj/1468
  18. Bohora A, Hegde V, Kokate S. Comparison of the antibacterial efficiency of neem leaf extract and 2% sodium hypochlorite against E. faecalis, C. albicans and mixed culture -an in vitro study. J Endod 2010;22(1):10–14. DOI: 10.4103/0970-7212.351972
  19. Prabhakar J, Balagopal S, Priya MS, et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of triphala (an Indian ayurvedic herbal formulation) and 0.2% chlorhexidine against Streptococcus mutans biofilm formed on tooth substrate: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2014;25(4):475–479. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.142539
  20. Alrazhi BA, Diab AH, Essa SA, et al. Antibacterial activity of the ethanolic extracts of Allium sativum L. bulbs and Zingiber officinale roscoe rhizomes as irrigating solutions. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;3:324–337.
  21. Park M, Bae J, Lee DS. Antibacterial activity of [10]-gingerol and [12]-gingerol isolated from ginger rhizome against periodontal bacteria. Phytother Res 2008;22(11):1446–1449. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.2473
  22. Umesh K, Chavan S, Tumpidi P. Effect of bitter gourd against S. mutans and L. acidophilus- an in-vitro study. Int j Ayurvedic med 2014;2(3):374–379.
  23. Mustafa M. Antibacterial efficacy of neem (Azadirachta indica) extract against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(10):791–794. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1932
  24. Upadhyay K, Kencheppa M, Gupta S, et al. Comparison of antibacterial efficacy of combination of turmeric and calcium hydroxide with three intracanal medicaments against various endodontic bacteria: an in vitro study. J Orofac Res 2015;5(4):113–117.
  25. Abood FM, Witwit LJ. The antimicrobial effect of some herbal extract on endodontic infection. J Pharm Sci Res 2018;10(7):1745–1747.
  26. Beshr KA, Abdelrahim RA. Antibacterial efficacy of Allium sativum (garlic) and chitosan incorporated into two root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: comparative study. Tanta Dent J 2019;16(2):94–98. DOI: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_3_19
  27. Arora T, Kang R, Mann J, et al. Antimicrobial activity of herbal extracts against recalcitrant endodontic pathogens: an original in vitro study. Int Dent J 2015;1(1):28.
  28. Bhargava K, Kumar T, Aggarwal S, et al. Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of neem, green tea, triphala and sodium hypochlorite: An in vitro study. J Dent Res 2015;2(1):13–16. DOI: 10.4103/2348-2915.154638
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.