Customized Digital Restoration: An Innovative Minimally Invasive Approach to Restore Young Permanent Molars: Case Series
Keywords :
Customized, Digital workflow, Young permanent molars, Zirconia restoration
Citation Information :
Customized Digital Restoration: An Innovative Minimally Invasive Approach to Restore Young Permanent Molars: Case Series. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2022; 5 (2):105-109.
Background: Crowns are provided for teeth that have extensive caries, developmental defects, or decalcified following pulpectomy/root canal treatment (RCT). Until now, prefabricated crowns have been available of varying sizes to match molars which require replacement after adolescence.
Materials and methods: This case series illustrates an innovative technique of customized digital restoration (CDR) with the use of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) for the fabrication of customized tooth-colored zirconium restoration for grossly decayed young permanent molars.
Result: Customized digital restoration is made through CAD-CAM which is more precise for young permanent molars.
Conclusion: This approach has the advantage of customization and definitive restoration in contrast to the prefabricated, unesthetic, and provisional options.
Kindelan SA, Day P, Nichol R, et al. UK national clinical guidelines in pediatric dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18(Suppl 1):20–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2008.00935.x
Basir L, Meshki R, Behbudi A, et al. Effects of restoring the primary dentition with stainless-steel crowns on children's salivary nickel and chromium levels, and the associations with saliva pH: a preliminary before-after clinical trial. Biol Trace Elem Res 2019;187(1):65–73. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-018-1376-0
Hamza M, Chlyah A, Bousfiha B, et al. Pathology and abnormality of the first permanent molar among children. In: Akarslan Z, Bourzgui F, editors. Human Teeth: Key Skills and Clinical Illustrations. London: IntechOpen; 2019. [cited 2022]. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/69760. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89725
Belleflamme MM, Geertsa SO, Louwette MM, et al. No post-no core approach to restore severely damaged posterior teeth: an up to 10-year retrospective study of documented endocrown cases. J Dent 2017;63:1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.009
Collares K, Correa MB, Laske M, et al. A practice-based research network on the survival of ceramic inlay/onlay restorations. Dent Mater 2016;32(5):687–694. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.02.006
Dursun E, Monnier-Da Costa A, Moussally C. Chairside CAD/CAM composite onlays for the restoration of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018;42(5):349–354. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.5.5
Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years—preliminary results. J Adhes Dent 1999;1(3):255–265.
Schmitter M, Hamadi K, Rammelsberg P. Survival of two post systems—five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int 2011;42(10):843–850.
Pelagalli P, Gatto R, Moscati M. Kids Digital Crown Technique: an innovative approach to restore primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2021;22(3):204–206. DOI: 10.23804/ejpd.2021.22.03.5
Davidovich E, Shay B, Nuni E, et al. An innovative treatment approach using digital workflow and CAD-CAM. Part 1: the restoration of endodontically treated molars in children. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17(4):1364. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041364
Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120(5):558–566. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0087
Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2010;36(4):609–617. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.002
Simsek H, Derelioglu S. In vitro comparative analysis of fracture resistance in inlay restoration prepared with CAD-CAM and different systems in the primary teeth. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:4292761. DOI: 10.1155/2016/4292761
