Journal of South Asian Association of Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( July-September, 2021 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparison of Novel NaviTip Obturating Technique with Lentulospiral and Endodontic Plugger Techniques in Primary Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Umapathy Thimmegowda, Joseph Thomas

Keywords : Endodontic plugger, Lentulospiral, NaviTip, Obturation, Primary teeth

Citation Information : Thimmegowda U, Thomas J. Comparison of Novel NaviTip Obturating Technique with Lentulospiral and Endodontic Plugger Techniques in Primary Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent 2021; 4 (2):104-111.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3080

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 26-08-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: The present study aims to compare the novel obturation technique, the NaviTip with that of lentulospiral and endodontic plugger techniques by using a phosphor imaging plate system, and a vista scan image plate scanner. Materials and methods: Sixty children with deep dentinal caries involving pulp between 4 years and 10 years were selected. They were allocated to group I (Lentulospiral), group II (Endodontic Plugger), and group III (NaviTip). In all groups, access opening was prepared and thus prepared canals in respective group patients were filled with slow-setting pure zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) with different methods. The Vista Scan Mini image plate scanner was used to take the image of the obturation. After the plate is exposed, it was laser scanned, the image was digitized and displayed on the computer. The success of obturation was evaluated by the modified Coll and Sadrian criteria. Data were collected and were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–Whitney post hoc analysis. Results: The overall more optimal filling was seen in group III (NaviTip) with 90% followed by group I (Lentulospiral) with 65% and group II (Endodontic Plugger) with (40%) and it is statistically significant (p > 0.05). In comparison, group III (NaviTip) showed comparable results in the mean number of voids when compared with group I (Lentulospiral) and group II (Endodontic Plugger). Conclusion: The NaviTip, followed by the lentulospiral, provided the best obturation of the root canals of primary molars, which suggests that NaviTip can be recommended as an alternative to other conventional obturation techniques.


PDF Share
  1. Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mctigue DJ, et al. Pediatric dentistry; infancy through adolescence. 4th ed., Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 2005. pp. 375–390.
  2. Memarpour M, Shahidi S, Meshki R. Comparison of different obturation techniques for primary molars by digital radiography. Pediatr Dent 2013;35(3):236–240.
  3. Chawla HS, Setia S, Gupta N. Evaluation of a mixture of zinc oxide, calcium hydroxide, and sodium fluoride as a new root canal filling material for primary teeth. J Indian Soc Prevent Dent 2008(2):53–58. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.41616.
  4. Hegde V, Arora S. Sealing ability of novel hydrophilic vs conventional hydrophobic obturation systems: a bacterial leakage study. J Conserv Dent 2015;18(1):62–65. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.148898.
  5. Ferreira VF, Angonese PM. Antimicrobial action of root canal filling pastes used in deciduous teeth. Rev Odonto Cienc 2010;25(1):65–68. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502010000100019.
  6. Khairwa A, Bhat M, Sharma R, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide with aloe vera as an obturating material in pulpectomy: an in vivo study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32(1):33–38. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.127051.
  7. Mahajan N, Bansal A. Various obturation methods used in deciduous teeth. Int J Med and Dent Sci 2015;4(1):708–713. DOI: 10.19056/ijmdsjssmes/2015/v4i1/79966.
  8. Khubchandani M, Baliga MS, Rawlani SS, et al. Comparative evaluation of different obturating technique in primary molars. An in vivo study. Eur J Gen Dent 2017;6(1):42–47. DOI: 10.4103/2278-9626.198611.
  9. Anas A, Asaad JM, Tarboush KA. A comparison of intra-oral digital imaging modalities: charged couple device versus storage phosphor plate. Int J Health Sci 2010;4(2):156–167.
  10. Coll JA, Sadrian R. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 1996;18(1):57–63.
  11. Singh A, Gupta N, Agarwal N, et al. A comparative volumetric evaluation of four obturating techniques in primary teeth using cone beam computed tomography. Pediatr Dent 2017;39(2):E111–E116.
  12. Subba Reddy VV, Shakunthala B. Comparative assessment of three obturating techniques in primary molars: an in-vivo study. Endodontology 1997;9(1):136.
  13. Peters CI, Koka RS, Highsmith S, et al. Calcium hydroxide dressings using different preparation and application modes density and dissolution by simulated tissue pressure. Int Endod J 2005;38(12):889–895. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01035.x.
  14. Vashista K, Sandhu M, Sachdev V. Comparative evaluation of obturating techniques in primary teeth: an in-vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(3):176–180. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005- 1309.
  15. Pandranki J, Chitturi RR, Vanga NV, et al. A comparative assessment of different techniques for obturation with endoflas in primary molars: an in-vivo study. Indian J Dent Res 2017;28(1):44–48. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_507_16.
  16. Nagaveni NB, Yadav S, Poornima P, et al. Volumetric evaluation of different obturation techniques in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2017;41(1):27–31. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4628-41.1.27.
  17. Guelmann M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in-vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004;28(4):323–326. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.28.4.j634167443m061n3.
  18. Kumar S, Raj S, Konde S, et al. Comparison of obturation techniques using three delivery systems an in-vitro study. Manipal J Dent Sci 2016;1(2):13–17.
  19. Gibson R, Howlett P, Cole IOB. Efficacy of spirally filled versus injected non-setting calcium hydroxide dressings. Dent Traumatol 2008;24(3):356–359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00540.x.
  20. Asokan S, Sooriaprakas C, Raghu V, et al. Volumetric analysis of root canal fillings in primary teeth using spiral computed tomography: an in-vitro study. J Dent Child (Chic) 2012;79(2):46–48.
  21. Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T, et al. An in-vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 1993;15(4):254–256.
  22. Mazaheri R, Bahr Alolimi Z, Khalili, et al. The comparative assessment of apical microleakage of primary teeth when filled with two different techniques. J Dent School 2007;25(3):304–309.
  23. Jermiah JE, Rao A, Srikant N, et al. Comparative evaluation of three obturating techniques in primary molars: an in vivo study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;43(6):372–375. DOI: 10.17796/1053-4625-43.6.2.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.